By definition of characteristic, q×1F=0q×a=q timesa+a+…a=q times(1F⋆a)+(1F⋆a)+⋯+(1F⋆a)=(q times1F+1F+⋯+1F)⋆a=(q×1F)⋆a=0F⋆a=0F
2)
By using the binomial theorem
(a+b)q=∑k=0q[(qk)×(ak⋆bq−k)]
So
(a+b)q=(q0)aqb0+(qq)a0bq+∑k=1q−1[(qk)×(ak⋆bq−k)]=aq+bq+∑k=1q−1[(qk)×(ak⋆bq−k)]
We prove that the equation (a+b)q=aq+bq holds by showing ∑k=1q−1[(qk)×(ak⋆bq−k)]=0F
Consider (qk) for all 1≤k≤q−1
(qk)=k(k−1)⋯2⋅1q(q−1)⋯(q−k+1)
For all l∈{1,…,k}, gcd(l,q)=1, because k is smaller than q (so l<q), and q is prime.
⟹ so the factor q remains, making (qk) a multiple of q
If an integer is divisible by q in Z, its image in F is 0F (the kernel of the ring homomorphism Z→F is (q))
⟹(qk)=0F in F∑k=1q−1[(qk)×(ak⋆bq−k)]=∑k=1q−1[0F⋆(ak⋆bq−k)]=∑k=1q−10F=0F
Therefore, the (a+b)q=aq+bq+0F=aq+bq
The claim is proved.
3)
Let Sk=∑i=1kai where k∈N, and for all i∈[k], ai∈F,
Claim (statement P): For all k≥1 and for all a1,…,ak∈F
Skq=i=1∑kaiq
Base: k=1S1q=(∑i=11ai)q=(a1)q=a1q
Induction Steps: k→k+1Sk+1q=(∑i=1k+1ai)q=(∑i=1kai+ak+1)q=(Sk+ak+1)q=Skq+ak+1q (using the result from question 2)
=(∑i=1kaiq)+ak+1q=∑i=1k+1aiq
Thus, by induction, the claim holds for all k∈N
4)
Let a be m×1q where m∈Naq=(m×1q)q=(∑i=1q1q)q=∑i=1q1qq=∑i=1q1q=m×1q=a
The claim is proved.