The proof re-derives the induction hypothesis, and does not prove for the k+1 case.
In order to prove the hypothesis, one need to prove k+k+11≤k+1 which is actually false.
1.3
a) limm→∞0.001m5100m3+10m2+m≤limm→∞0.001m5111m3=limm→∞m2111000=0
b) limm→∞(logm)3log(m3)=limm→∞(logm)33logm=limm→∞(logm)23=0
c) limm→∞23me2m=limm→∞(8e2)m≈limm→∞0.92m=0
d) limm→∞log(g(m))log(f(m))
Counterexample:
f(m)=e2m, g(m)=23mlimm→∞ln(2)⋅3m2m=3ln(2)2
The statement is disapproved.
e) limm→∞ln(m)ln(ln(m))=limm→∞21ln(m)21ln(ln(m))
let x=ln(m)=limx→∞221xln(x)=2xln(x)=limx→∞22x1x1=limx→∞x2=0 (L’Hopital’s rule)
1.4
a)
Hypothesis: 21⋅43⋅⋯⋅2n2n−1≤3n+11,n≥1
Base: n=1: 21≤3⋅1+11=21
Steps: 21⋅43⋅⋯⋅2n2n−1⋅2(n+1)2(n+1)−1≤3n+11⋅2n+22n+1
3n+11⋅2n+22n+1≤3n+41
(2n+1)3n+4≤(2n+2)3n+1
(2n+1)2(3n+4)≤(2n+2)23n+1
(4n2+4n+1)(3n+4)≤(4n2+8n+4)(3n+1)
12n3+28n2+19n+4≤12n3+28n2+20n+4
0≤n
which is true because n≥1, and the hypothesis is proven.
b)
Although the statement 21⋅43⋅⋯⋅2n2n−1≤3x+11≤3x1 is true, we need to calculate 3n+33n instead of 3n+43n+1 during the induction proof. However, the following inequality holds for all n≥13n+33n≤3n+43n+1
, which means we have a stricter boundary causing the induction proof to fail.