Why exists?

Important

Whenever there is no conflict of interest between parties, we need no contract. Cheap talk is enough

NOTE

A contract consists of background legal rules + written contract

Sequential vs. Spot Transaction

  • Spot transaction: Exchange is completed essentially at one point in time; obligations are settled immediately.
    • In another word: “cheap talk”
    • buying food
  • Sequential transaction: Performance and obligations extend over time.
    • A warranty creates a sequential element because the seller may still have obligations after the sale.

Example

The Farmer and the Viper

VC vs. Inventor

Ex-Ante vs. Ex-Post View

  • Ex-ante: Evaluates a decision before the outcome is known, based on expectations, risks, and available information.
  • Ex-post: Evaluates the decision after the outcome is known, using the actual consequences.

Penalty Clause

  • Correct perspective: Evaluate a penalty/liquidated damages clause ex ante, based on the risks known when the contract was made.
  • Problem: Courts often see only the ex post outcome. If only a mild loss occurred, catastrophic risks considered during drafting are invisible counterfactuals.
  • This can make a reasonable liquidated damages clause appear overcompensatory or punitive.

How do parties commit?

  • Moral force of promises/ Taboos
  • Reputation/ Kinship(亲属关系)
  • Formal enforcement/ Governance Systems and Institutions
  • Technical solutions

Why do state enforce contracts?

  • economic growth
    • specialization (division of labor)

Damages

Liquidated Damages vs. Expectation Damages

  • Expectation damages: Compensation calculated after breach to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed.
  • Liquidated damages: Damages agreed in advance in the contract, usually as a fixed amount or formula.

Key idea: Liquidated damages are often a pre-agreed estimate of expectation damages.

Liquidated damages → mainly ex-ante.
Expectation damages → mainly ex-post.

Challenges

Contract design has two problems:

  1. Economic: choose mechanisms that reduce transaction costs and support efficient cooperation.
  2. Legal: draft them so courts are likely to interpret and enforce them as intended. Courts may reinterpret or invalidate clauses, e.g. for unconscionability or public policy.